Thursday, 9 March 2017

Bullet Journal Statistics for February 2017

Another month has passed, and it's time to look back at how my bullet journal is doing. February was unusual for me being sick for a while, and for +Mickey Blake  going to the US starting on the 9th. Unsettles my daily rhythm, such as it is, and means I have to take care of +The Frida Diaries myself. Still, I survived, and got some things done. Let's see how March becomes unusual:)

A total of 110 daily tasks were handled, including carry-over from last month, but not including carry-over to next month. Of these, 71 (65%) were done the same day, and 14 (13%) got done the day after. However, this time I postponed tasks for much longer, partly while sick, but also afterwards. One tasks got done after 7 postponement, and one after 8 (required going to the other side of town with Frida in tow)! My arrow system gets annoying enough when I have to write so many dashes that I eventually get it done:) I'm happy to see that the long-postponed tasks don't tend to then get cancelled.

I had 6 tasks that I cancelled and only one that I migrated to a higher level.



My Monthly Tasks didn't move that much, of 23 tasks 4 got done, 3 got cancelled, and the rest moved on to March.

So far, March looks better, with three tasks already done, but you never know. The monthly tasks are decidedly my weak spot, and I should figure out how to get them included more.

For the month overview, I started some checkbox columns. The most successful one is for watering plants, which I now have pretty regularly every third day, and the plants are much happier for it. I used to think of every third day as my goal, but I most definitely slipped. Other checkbox columns are regarding exercise (had a short streak of success) and training Frida (occasionally done).

My bullet journal for work (separate notebook for work-life balance) is behaving similarly, but has also allowed me to track how much time I spend working, turned out to hover around 9 hours a day without me realising it. No wonder I felt fairly exhausted.

I've started sometimes adding some boxes at the bottom of a right-hand page, for things I know I can't do immediately, but don't want to go into the Monthly page. Typically, I will have the coming two days there plus "future". The "future" box is a bit dangerous, though, since I don't necessarily look back there when I get to the future.

Saturday, 21 January 2017

Bullet Journals Without the Pastels

Late last year, +Riona MacNamara introduced me to the idea of bullet journals, and I decided to give it a try over Christmas. It worked out for me and has seriously helped me getting shit done, without a snowfall of post-it notes to keep track of things (I have graphs and data to back this claim up, see the Statistics section). There are many pages describing bullet journals, most of them showing intricately decorated journals done in pastels. If you're allergic to pastels, or don't have time to decorate your planner, here's my explanation. Guaranteed no florals.


Task Tracking

Here are the three parts of my bullet journal I use the most, the task tracking parts. It has three levels: generic future tasks roughly by month, tasks for the current month, and tasks for today.

The future tracker is where you keep tasks that you want to get around to eventually, but either don't have time for just yet, or they need to happen at a certain time, like doing taxes or shipping Christmas presents.

Long-term task tracker (left side)
The monthly tasks tracker is for tracking tasks you should get done soon - this acts as a pool for tasks to pull up and do on an appropriate day (this month got split over two folds, not a good idea).

Monthly planner. Not used that much. Daily task tracking columns added just the day before
Monthly task tracking. Used a lot.

The daily tasks tracker is where you put things you want/need to get done today. Tasks here should (like in Getting Things Done) be concrete and actionable, and you shouldn't have too many - except for truly time-critical things, I try to keep this down to 5 tasks.
Two days of daily task tracking, with tasks not done migrated to later days

While the journal can also be used for random notes (indicated with a dash) and events (indicated with a ring), the task tracking is the important part. In my view, the bullet journal's main strength is that is allows for the facts of real life: you don't always get everything done nicely and tidily. Sometimes you get distracted, some things are harder than you thought, sometimes you just don't have the energy. So it has a simple system for updating your tasks:

A task that has been done is marked with a cross (or, as I prefer, a checkmark).

A task that has been scheduled (i.e. given a more specific time) is marked with a greater-than.

A task that has been put off (i.e. moved to a later time of the same granularity) is marked with an arrow.

A task that has been migrated (i.e. moved to a more general time) is marked with a less-than.

These markings and other notation are summarized in a legend at the inside cover.

Legend (slightly outdated)

I do an update first thing in the morning when I add the new day's entry. Tasks I didn't get around to the day before will be migrated either to the new day if I still think I can get around to it, or up to the monthly tracker if other things have gotten in the way. Having to migrate the previous day's tasks encourages me to de-schedule things I'm unlikely to get around to as well as getting the things done.


Index & collections

The task tracking is the most important part for me, as it's what helps me get shit done. But there are other cool ideas in this system.

The first few pages are dedicated to an index. If your book doesn't have page numbers, just add them, and then add the page numbers in the index if a page has something relevant to a particular subject:

Index

By having the page numbers on the right, it's pretty easy to add more pages, so the subject can be tracked across many instances. As you can see, I'm not using this all that much yet.

Notes and events should be kept short - the day planner should not drown in them - so if you want to write more on a subject, dedicate a page (or more) to it, referring to it in the index. I have only done that a little bit, but will probably do it more in my work journal.


Modifications

Bullet journaling is explicitly modifiable, and I've changed a few things and am looking at a few other.

Instead of an X for tasks done, I use a checkmark - just feels better. I might use X then for cancelled jobs, and use strike-through for anything that's either done, moved, or cancelled. It's not a big deal in the daily section, but in the monthly section using strike-through would help scanning for pending tasks.

I use < for things migrated to longer-term (day to month or month to longer-term) and > for things scheduled (long-term to month, month to daily), but for things that move at the same level (monthly to monthly or most commonly daily to daily), I changed to using ->, and at the suggestion of my wife (who has also taken up this system, with some variations of her own), adding one more dash per day it gets moved, so I can see how many times a task has been moved. The triple-arrow you can see in the picture of the 14th's page had my first triple-moved tasks, which got to quintuple before I finally got it done. The embarrassment!

I add a little extra data on the header of the daily entries: Where I am, what the weather is like, and how I slept.

I haven't been using my monthly day overview much, but I recently added tracking for a couple of things I want to get done regularly. As you can see, I need to work on that bit. Having the month overview and tasks on the same fold would probably work better, as I would get reminded more.

One problem I'm still considering what to do about is that when getting close to the end of a day, month, or long-term period, you get things you really want to put on the page-to-be, because you know you can't do them in the current period. I'm considering changing the long-term plan to cover 5 months and a "future" section, and then making a new one after 4 months, so there's never a time without at least one full month and future section available. 

I use a paper journal partly because I don't trust my phone to not run out of battery at an inconvenient time, but mainly because if I used my phone, I would immediately get distracted and forgot what I was about to put in the journal. And it works really well, especially with having a little pen strap at the back of the book and a elastic band over all the unused pages. That way I can open to the daily page with my left hand and get my pen ready with my right hand very quickly. The two bookmark strips are handy for marking the monthly and long-term pages.


Statistics

After my first three weeks of journalling, I did some statistics on my tasks. This was a couple of days before the pictures above were taken.

I entered a total of 74 tasks in the daily sections in the first 21 days. Of these, 49 got done the same day, 12 got done the next day, 3 the day after, 4 got migrated to monthly or long-term, and 6 got cancelled. Four days had no tasks done, two of which I was travelling, and two were work-days (I'm excluding the few work-related items I entered because they eventually got moved to a separate journal).

Of the 33 tasks entered in my January section, 14 have gotten done by the 15th, and two got cancelled because I didn't get them done before I left the relevant country.

Since I did these statistics, I managed to get a task up to five bars on the forward arrow, but I did get it done. That's the kind of task that would otherwise have laid forgotten in a corner until I saw it several months later and thought, "oh, yeah, I ought to have done that, but I keep forgetting". Amazingly, this journal system helps me avoid that sad fate, and Gets Shit Done.

Thursday, 3 September 2015

It Was The Best Of Timers, It Was The Worst Of Timers

Long time ago, we bought some kitchen timers from Ikea. We liked them. They were simple, rugged, and worked well. At some point, we acquired another timer, a rip-off of sorts, which was almost but not entirely the same, different in several annoying ways. So when our last of the old Ikea timers died, we went out and picked up some new ones, happy that some things stayed the same.
Except they didn't. Turned out our memories had been playing tricks on us, and the "rip-off" timer was actually the redesigned Fantast timer. The changes were small, and one might think change aversion was the deeper issue. But if that was the case, half a year of use would surely make us get used to them. Instead, they annoy me every time I use them. In just a few changes, they have gone from the best timers to the worst. Well, not technically the worst, they still work, but they have changed from objects I like to use to objects I dislike.
What were the changes? The alarm beep changed, becoming more shrill - mayhap intending to be easier to hear? It certainly ensure that we react quickly, to turn off that infernal noise. The buttons changed feel, not responding as reliably as the old ones. But most importantly, they changed the button layout. Before, the three buttons were "Minute", "Second", "Start/Stop", in that order. An order that makes sense - first you set the minutes, then you set the seconds, then you start. Intuitive. The new buttons are "ºC/ºF - S/S", "▵ - Minute", "▽ - Second".
Yes, temperature. They added a temperature sensor to the timer, and a metal stick with a cord intended to be stuck into meat. A nice idea in theory, but when we tried it the temperature meter worked really poorly, so we just threw away the stick. Extra feature, not needed, not desired, but forced upon us because they could. It complicated the buttons and added extra hardware for something that's only useful a small fraction of the time and which is better done by a tool that can actually go inside the oven.
But why the change in button order? Why should the Start/Stop functionality go first? Unclear.
They removed another feature that I found handy - no longer can I click on "Minute" while the timer is running to add an extra minute. I suspect that change was based on feedback that some people didn't realize what they were doing and got the wrong time out of it, but I used that feature with some regularity.
Now I may have to scrounge around for old-style timers at garage sales, or get the funny round Stäm timers, or (gasp) get a non-Ikea timer!

The morale? Be careful when adding new features to a great product, if they interfere with the core functionality. Or, alternatively, this situation made for too good a blog post title to pass by.